Article Series of “Science Approach of Creation Model”-4

Fourth Article

Click Here for Turkish Versiyon

Click Here for First Article (How can We Correlate the Natural Causes, Which Seem to Move Randomly and İrregularly, to the Magnificent Order That Appears in the Universe and Matter?)

Click Here for Second Article (Why are We So Persistent in Being Scientific? Why is it Important to Establish the Scientific Compliance of the Creator? How Should the Scientific Criteria Be Questioned? What is the Right Training Method and Strategy?)

Click Here for Third Article (That is How They Set the Scientific Method! A Third Alternative to Rejection and Acceptance: Producing Our Own Concepts and Approaches!)

Article Title: 

“You Always Criticize and Say the Wrong Things. So, What are You Saying?”

Ageless Perspective that is described as Old and Outdated

First Part:

The Problem of Islamic World Not being able to Get Rid of the Materialist Framework in the Field of Science

The Surprising comments that made to our book named “The Academic Proof of the Creator”

Important note: It was surprising and sad that some objections from the Muslim community came to our English book “The Academic Proof of the Creator”, which the atheists did not object to. They asked us what the academic and scientific concepts meant. (That is, they implied that we do not know those concepts and that we should learn.) They also stated that they did not see any academic proof in our study. Subhanallah!

Our intention by underlining this topic is to draw attention to the seriousness of the problem of not being able to get rid of the materialist framework in the scientific community which we come across in the Muslim community.

Under the comment section of our book named The Academic Proof of the Creator, no one but some Muslims objected to us. We are seriously upset that there is only one objection in this regard, made by those who should support us and the fact that there is no such knowledge in the Islamic world. It means that we do not work at all on this important subject that we face such a terrible picture.

Even Dr. John Lennox, who is a Christian, understood the subject much better and tells it like a student of Risale-i Nur. But some Muslim academics still see the field of experimentation and observation as the limited framework of science, and do not consider the beyond as scientific. Unfortunately, such brothers and sisters make presentations at international congresses of creation. We have no problem with individuals. We cannot have. Conversation and respect stand apart. But we have to draw attention to this serious illness, to give notice and to present a prescription.

However, the most basic information we will tell on behalf of Islam and the Risale-i Nur to the scientific society and humanity is that acceptance of a creator is scientifically suitable. You can watch and read our seminar given below. We strongly recommend you do this. We especially recommend the seminar video, we highly wish that you feel that excitement.

The most recent title in the seminar text is ” The Scientific Compliance of the Thought of The Existence of A Creator”.

Of course, we do not mean being scientific (conformity to science) by that, whose framework is limited and the criteria are imposed as “tangible, visible, experimentable and observable”!

An Scientific Approach Which Accepts the Existence of a Creator (The Concept of the Universe Questioning Existence)

Üsküdar University Special Seminar Program (Visual/Interactive Seminar Text and Video)

Article Address: https://wp.me/p6RGG1-1UO

Short Presentation:

In this very special seminar presentation, which will appeal to all those who question existence and especially attract the attention of the academic community, first of all, we will to share some of our conclusions on the value, for the humanity, of the scientific works and approaches which search for evidence for the acceptance of a creator and which make their conclusions in this regard.

Our seminar aims to provide serious analysis and studies, as a philosophical basis, in terms of introduction to the Scientific World of such an educational approach which accepts the existence of a Creator, by developing scientific models, and interpretations which can prove to be alternatives to scientific approaches to the existence of the Creator, by developing alternative scientific approaches that can be accepted and by establishing the philosophy of science and curriculum of “Medresetüzzehra Education Approach”.

This presentation is a turning point in the academic community. The spirit and spirituality of Medresetüzzehra began to manifest itself in all its glory and with the highest and lush voice and sound logic. You will hear the footsteps of the Qur’an civilization … Read it… ”

We have built the very foundations of “The Compliance of the Idea of a Creator to Scientific Nature”. What we argue, in fact, is not that revolutionary. In fact, there are many scientific theories and models that are out of mentioned limit. In fact, these are seen and accepted as proven models. Example: Big Bang.

But we enter the issue not from this point, but from the simplest and most unquestionable place. You can witness the accuracy of this claim in a candescent way when you seriously and with attention examine the seminar text above and especially the latest and important title stated as “…”.

Second Part:

A Point Often Criticized by Those Who Accept the Existence of the Creator and Reject Atheism:

“You always criticize and say the wrong things. So, what are you saying? “

Our answer to this interesting question is:

First of all, we have to say that we have answered these questions and demands very well. Yes, of course we criticize and point out the wrong approaches.

But we also do the following: Serious Analysis in the Nature of Intellectual (Theoretical) Infrastructure of Science of Creation Model, Basic Approach Methods, Original Definitions, Conceptualizations and Categorical Evaluations, Independent Top Approaches Unaffected by Variability of Scientific DataMethods of Investigation, Analysis and Evidence Based on a Sound Logic Setup, Inferences Based on Current Science Approaches.

To see that all of these methods are both comprehensible and very strong, please visit the below articles and seminar videos:

1- “ Is It Possible That Material Factors in Nature Come Together and Create Living Beings?”

(2. International Creation in the Light of Sciences Presentation)

(15 minutes of short congress presentation video and full presentation text) 

Article Address: https://wp.me/p6RGG1-1pG

Abstract: The purpose of study is to clearly reveal out whether it is possible for the material factors in nature to come together and give life to things. Firstly, basic concepts such as “coincidence, material factors, the laws of nature, the mechanisms of evolution”, on which the existence of the material and the formation of an object is based, will be discussed and their features will be analysed. Then, stating that a claim to form the base for the answer to a question like “What is the main reason for the creation of this object or that event?” should first make three issues clear. The end of the analysis: It will be basically found that, it would be a non-scientific, difficult and vague way to try to explain the creation of an object through material factors and nature or by claiming that it has come out by itself. This study will contribute to the determination of the fact that it would be more scientific, reasonable, rational and acceptable to explain the creation of an object with a Creator, as an alternative possibility involving required conveniences and that, if there was a scientifically acceptable model, such model would better deserve to be scientifically accepted.

2- “How is Everything Taking Place With Divine Power?”

(3. International Creation in the Light of Sciences Presentation)

(15 minutes of short congress presentation video and full presentation text)

Article Address: https://wp.me/p6RGG1-1Jt

Abstract: The purpose of study is to clearly reveal out whether it is possible for the material factors in nature to come together and give life to things. The real faith in Oneness (Tawheed) is not complete with the simple acceptance of Allah as the creator of the apparent universe. Such a belief is the first step of the hierarchy of the faith, and comes short of fundamental qualities of the faith requested by Allah in his Quran. In fact, what is really wanted is, in addition to acceptance of the fact that every matter and object appearing and every activity taking place in this universe is created directly and ruled by the divine power itself, the complete and absolute rejection of the existence of anything that is supposed to be interfering and assisting in these activities and rulings. This is an unbelievably great and magnificent issue. In order to reach this level of belief in Allah and a “doubtless and informed faith based on strong evidence”, it is necessary to make a serious and detailed investigation. We are dealing with the explanations of important facts: How everything happens with divine will and they continue to depend on that and the ease of this for Allah and that it is easy for Allah to create and control everything with the same ease He creates and controls just one thing.

The analysis is performed through analogies that are built upon various scientifically accepted data, comparisons and logical reasoning methods. The end of the analysis: It will be clearly demonstrated that the creation and management of all entities and beings from the same center and of being created by someone, which we would accept as a single and independent creator, is the necessity to an extent impossible to think alternatively.

Third Part:

Generally for science approaches that accept the existence of the creator and make inferences in this direction, an objection can be brought forward for our discovery journeys Risale-i Nur Training Program in particular:

It can be said and it is said: “Your work is dominated by an old and outdated perspective!”

We Are Responding This Ugly Objection with this strong argument:

In particular, the students of Risale-i Nur know very well that the unseemly characterization of Risale-i Nur’s as outdated Qur’anic viewpoint is inaccurate and that the old and outdated perspective is timeless.

That perspective is updated only in terms of wording and style of expression, and repeated in different and new ways, freshly expressed, declared and presented. This is exactly what we do in our academic nature Risale-Nur Training Program.

Those who object to us may also advise us to learn biology, as they are unaware of the existence of “Independent Higher Approaches Unaffected by the Variability of Scientific Data” in the methodology of faith science and practice! But they are mistaken! Why?

Because our higher approaches are not affected by the variability of scientific data, and they are completely independent, timeless and fixed models in terms of their nature (regardless of the processes and mechanisms of the events in nature, regardless of which fancy name is given).

What we do is merely to express those timeless facts in a timely and conjuncture-based manner, by making inferences related to current science approaches, renewing them, putting them into a systematic form and re-introducing them in accordance with the understanding of the present.