This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page
In this section of our book, we come across two original examples which narrate another impossibility, the third impossible scenario of the three impossible scenarios which could have been faced in case of the acceptance of the claim of nature, which is the third way of the three ways, “material causes, self-creation and nature” that are brought forward to explain the coming into existence of matter by leaving the Creator out of consideration. These examples make it easier for us to understand what the laws of nature are and what they are not.
This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)” Click Here for Book Page
With a different look at the Big Bang, the probability of the formation of the existing universe, in its current form, is studied. Moreover, the probability of the formation of a universe, which makes life possible, by chance is analyzed.
This article text is part of our book: “Rehearsal Scene (Evidence for Eternal Life) Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Resurrection)”Click Here for Book Page
The main problem related to the understanding Allah’s existence and as well as the necessity of Hereafter, comes from the inability to make sense out of the works which lead to these truths and which are visible everywhere before our very eyes, from the inability to see their close relationship with these truths and the inability to infer that such activities are the results of these truths.
You see, when a work of art is beheld, first of all, the art over it should be recognized and appreciated so that it can be inferred that it is the work of an Artist.Okumaya devam et →
This article text is part of our book: “Rehearsal Scene (Evidence for Eternal Life) Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Resurrection)” Click Here for Book Page
Generosity, beauty and excellence. In order these three truths, which show themselves all over the cosmos and make, in every occasion, apparent that they are not limited by any factor, to be able to manifest themselves in a way worthy of their infiniteness, generosity should be able to bestow infinite bounty and infinite kindness and to make His infinite beauty seen in numerous ways and in an eternal manner. And His flawless perfection, which manifests itself with His works, should be displayed to those who will appreciate, admire and wonderingly gaze at it. So to speak, it would be necessary that they should express themselves in these ways and they should not consent that these spiritual and secret treasures remain hidden. If you ask: How do you reach this conclusion in essence? Then, we will have an answer with two options. Okumaya devam et →
This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page
Stephen Hawking who tries to substitute the Creator with M-Theory, multiple universes and the law of gravity, says this: “God may exist, but science could explain the universe without a creator. Just like Darwinism ended the necessity of a creator in biology, new theories of physics have made the role of a creator in the formation of the universe unnecessary.”
In his book titled “Grand Design” he claims that “Since there is something called the law of gravitation, the universe could create itself from nothing and has done so indeed. This self-creation is the reason of the fact that something has happened rather than nothing and that the universe and we exist”. And he adds: “It is not necessary to refer to God for the ignition of the spark and the readiness of the universe for functioning”.
In this thinking, which could make some categorical mistake by replying “M Theory” when asked about the origin of the law of gravity, and which seems to forget that laws and theorems themselves do not have the power to create, we are asked to believe that something, which was not existing yet, at a time when it was still not existing, all of a sudden made itself exist for an unknown reason and formed all visible material/objects in this universe.
This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page
According to “Mechanic Universe” model which was established by Isaac Newton, the creator provided the matter and the laws at the beginning. Then, the universe started to work like a clock and since then, it has been working like that. In fact, Newton was a devout Christian. But there is another point to be made here. The Christianity which lost its originality is not a religion based on the doctrine, belief of Oneness of the creator (Tawheed). And Tawheed is something more than just believing the existence of a creator in a simple way.
This article text is part of our book: “Academic Proof of the Creator Visual/Interactive Book (New Perspectives from the Treatise of Nature)”Click Here for Book Page
Let us have a look at this famous, perfect and ageless example of Pharmacy, which is used in Treatise of Nature to explain the first item of the nine impossibilities, which is used to narrate how material reasons/causes are incapable of creating the matter/objects, grasping the issue at its roots. It is attempted to create a living mixture, the formula by using different substances contained in around one hundred jars. Then we see that there are a great number of mixtures/formulas with functions of living things. Then we see that, many mixtures showing the characteristics of liveliness have been made around. When we analyse their content in a detailed manner, we see that these mixtures are put together and produced with special and precise measurements. We certainly know that such a result can’t be obtained with the random mixing of the materials in the jars with the blowing of the wind.
We would like to develop our example little further and we imagine ourselves in a distant future in a fantastic “Biotechnology Laboratory” of a science fiction film.